As he prepares to leave Congress, South Dakota’s Republican Representative Dusty Johnson didn’t hold back on criticism of President Donald Trump and the divisive political climate that has overtaken Washington. In a recent address at a Sioux Falls Downtown Rotary Club meeting, Johnson expressed both frustration and hope for the future of the Republican Party and national governance.

“I won’t miss the circus, but I’ll miss the clowns,” he remarked, drawing laughter while highlighting the chaotic nature of current politics—an environment that he believes is not conducive to meaningful change.

His candid comments came during a question-and-answer session as he reflected on eight years in office. Johnson, who will depart from Congress in January, touched on issues regarding partisanship and voters’ preferences for politicians who project strength over those who are effective problem solvers.

“If voters don’t start choosing thoughtful problem solvers a little more often, then getting things done in D.C. is going to continue to be a challenge,” he asserted.

Johnson’s departure from Congress follows a failed gubernatorial bid in June. He previously served on the state Public Utilities Commission and as chief of staff for former Governor Dennis Daugaard.

Reflecting on the current political landscape, Johnson lamented the heightened tribalism within both major parties. “I think things are markedly worse in D.C. than when I arrived eight years ago,” he said, pointing to the increased animosity and populist frustrations that now define political engagement.

Despite acknowledging these challenges, Johnson maintains an optimistic outlook for the GOP. He believes the party is positioned to capitalize on national policy wins before the new Congress begins.

However, he cautions against the allure of choosing candidates based more on their combativeness than their ability to enact policies. “The central problem is voters choosing fighters over those who can actually deliver results,” Johnson warned, emphasizing the need for a change in voter priorities.

When asked about his views on Trump, Johnson expressed dissatisfaction with several of the former president’s personal characteristics. “I find many of his personal traits lacking,” he said. Nonetheless, he acknowledged that Trump’s clarity of conviction on issues like border security resonates with many supporters.

Johnson noted that while Trump has reinvigorated a segment of the electorate, his approach often involves quick and harsh criticisms, especially of political opponents or allies. “He doesn’t value our allies and friendships abroad as much as I do,” Johnson remarked, illustrating a divide within the party.

On a more hopeful note, Johnson highlighted the resilience and innovation within the American private sector. He believes that there are numerous reasons for optimism outside the political arena, especially in areas like healthcare and local governance.

His comments also reflected a broader concern about the future of American politics, specifically regarding the diminishing appeal of decent, principled candidates willing to run for office. “Fewer and fewer decent people are running for the first time,” he said, warning that this trend could lead to a less functional government.

As he prepares to exit the political fray, Johnson stated his desire for his next two decades to be as impactful as his last. He did not outline specific plans for his post-Congress career but emphasized a commitment to continue contributing positively, perhaps in different capacities.

In his closing remarks, Johnson reiterated his belief that the current political fever would eventually subside. He envisions a future where rational discourse replaces heated tribalism and cooperation resumes as a cornerstone of governance.

“The anger and frustration we see today will shift,” he said confidently. “I just hope it happens sooner rather than later.”

As a member of the House of Representatives, Johnson has been uniquely positioned to observe the changing dynamics within the GOP and Congress at large. While he has been critical of Trump’s leadership style, he acknowledges the complexities of party loyalty and governance in a polarized environment.

Johnson’s reflections may serve as an important cautionary note for the future of the Republican Party as it navigates the turbulent waters of American politics, particularly as the next election cycle approaches.

With his departure imminent, the question remains: can the Republican Party realign itself to prioritize effective governance over conflict, setting a clear path for the future while retaining the support of its base?