The neighborhood store millions of Americans depend on for groceries, prescriptions and household essentials could soon disappear.
Some of the country’s best-known retail chains are closing underperforming locations as they cut costs, abandon weak markets and redirect money toward more profitable stores. Kroger, Grocery Outlet, Safeway and Walgreens are all reducing their footprints, with communities in New York, New Jersey and across the United States bracing for the consequences.
Together, the announcements signal a dramatic shake-up in the places Americans shop.
Kroger previously announced that it planned to close approximately 60 stores over an 18-month period after sluggish sales left some locations unable to meet expectations.
The Cincinnati-based grocery empire operates numerous regional brands, meaning stores affected may not necessarily carry the Kroger name. Its network includes Fred Meyer, Fry’s Food and Drug, Harris Teeter, Foods Co, Food 4 Less, King Soopers, Mariano’s, Pick ’n Save and QFC.
The company has not released a comprehensive public list identifying every location scheduled to close.

Kroger’s retreat from weaker stores comes as the company pursues expansion elsewhere. It recently agreed to acquire Pennsylvania-based Giant Eagle in a reported $1.65 billion deal expected to close next year.
The acquisition would add 197 supermarkets and 11 standalone pharmacies to Kroger’s enormous network.
That creates a striking contrast: While dozens of existing stores are being eliminated, the company is spending heavily to absorb another regional chain. The strategy suggests Kroger is not shrinking everywhere—it is concentrating its resources in markets and locations executives believe can generate stronger returns.
Grocery Outlet is making its own painful cuts.
The discount retailer announced that 36 stores would close because of poor performance, including six locations in New Jersey. The company is known for deeply discounted merchandise, with some private-label and surplus products advertised at 40% to 70% below conventional prices.
For families struggling with high grocery bills, losing access to such a store could be especially damaging.
Grocery Outlet President and CEO Jason Potter said the East Coast would suffer the greatest impact, with approximately 30% of the company’s locations in that region expected to shut down.
The 36 stores represent only about 6% of Grocery Outlet’s total network, but percentages offer little comfort to shoppers living near one of the affected locations. Restructuring firm Gordon Brothers has published information concerning available leases, offering clues about which properties are being abandoned.
Safeway stores are also disappearing as parent company Albertsons reduces its physical footprint.
Albertsons operates more than 20 grocery brands, including Vons, Jewel-Osco, Acme Markets and Shaw’s. At least 30 company-owned stores reportedly closed during 2025, with another 12 expected to follow in 2026.
Safeway has so far closed three identified locations associated with expiring leases.
“We are coming to the end of our lease at this location, and have made the decision to reinvest our resources into other existing stores,” the company said when explaining one closure.
That language reflects a common corporate calculation. Instead of spending money renewing a lease or renovating an aging location, retailers move those resources into stores with stronger sales or better long-term prospects.
But what appears efficient on a balance sheet can be devastating at street level.
When a supermarket closes, residents do not simply lose a place to buy cereal or milk. They may lose access to fresh produce, affordable meat, pharmacy services and jobs. Elderly residents, people with disabilities and families without cars can be hit particularly hard.
If no replacement opens nearby, an already vulnerable neighborhood can move closer to becoming what public-health experts describe as a “food desert”—an area where affordable and nutritious food is difficult to obtain.
Walgreens, while primarily a pharmacy chain rather than a traditional supermarket, is part of the same retail contraction. The company has closed locations in multiple states, including New York and New Jersey, under a multiyear cost-cutting plan targeting less profitable stores.
In 2024, Walgreens announced plans to eliminate approximately 1,200 locations over three years while pursuing roughly $1 billion in savings. The company later went private and reportedly reduced the scale of the closure program, but stores have continued to disappear.
The causes extend far beyond one company.
Traditional supermarkets operate on famously thin profit margins. Rising wages, rent, utilities, transportation expenses and theft can quickly turn a marginal location into an unprofitable one. Consumers are also shifting spending toward warehouse clubs, supercenters, delivery services and discount competitors.
At the same time, persistent food inflation has forced some households to buy fewer items or trade down to cheaper brands. A store can remain busy while still struggling to generate adequate profit.

The closures may also create opportunities. Independent grocers, ethnic food markets and smaller discount chains could move into abandoned properties. Local governments may offer incentives to attract replacement stores in communities at risk of losing essential food access.
But replacements are not guaranteed.
Customers should also remember that an announced companywide total does not mean every state or every brand will lose the same number of locations. Kroger, Albertsons and Grocery Outlet have not provided a complete final list covering all reported closures, and plans can change as leases, buyers and restructuring decisions evolve.
What is already clear, however, is that America’s grocery map is being redrawn.
Some communities will gain stores through acquisitions and investment. Others will watch familiar signs come down, employees leave and shelves go dark.
For corporate executives, these may be underperforming locations.
For the people who depend on them, they are something far more important: the place where dinner comes from.
