WASHINGTON — In his first appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee as FBI director, Kash Patel came under withering fire from Democrats who accused him of politicizing the bureau, purging career officials, and bending to President Donald Trump’s demands for retribution.
“Mr. Patel, in just eight months, you have assaulted the institutional integrity of the FBI,” said Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), in one of several heated exchanges Tuesday that underscored the depth of mistrust between Patel and his critics on Capitol Hill.
Patel, a Trump loyalist and former White House aide, was confirmed in January amid assurances he would not “look backward” or seek revenge. But Democrats say his record since taking office tells another story. At least five senior agents and executives were abruptly fired last month, including officials tied to the Jan. 6 investigation and past probes of Trump. Three of them have now filed lawsuits, alleging Patel knew the firings were “likely illegal” but carried them out under White House pressure.
“I’m not going to mince words: you lied to us,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) told Patel.

Patel denied the accusation. “Anyone that’s been terminated failed to meet the needs of the FBI and uphold their constitutional duties,” he said, calling the claims “a rant of false information.”
The hearing took place against the backdrop of last week’s assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, which Patel highlighted as proof of his agency’s effectiveness. He boasted that the FBI apprehended the suspected shooter, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, within 33 hours. But Democrats questioned his judgment after he prematurely announced “the subject” was in custody — a statement that turned out to refer to the wrong man.
“Could I have been more careful in my verbiage and included ‘a’ subject instead of ‘the’ subject? Sure,” Patel conceded.
Republicans, meanwhile, rallied to Patel’s defense. Committee chair Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) praised him for “returning the FBI to its law enforcement mission” after years of what he described as political interference by his predecessor.
Still, Patel faced pointed questions from Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) over his tolerance of conspiracy theories promoted by his deputy, Dan Bongino — including an unsubstantiated claim that pipe bombs planted on Jan. 6 were an “inside job.”
Patel pushed back hard. “I find it a disgusting thing that everyone and anyone would jettison our 31 years of combined experience that is now at the helm of the FBI, delivering historic results and historic speeds for the American people,” he said.
Patel also rejected accusations that he is working from an “enemies list,” despite Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) pointing out that roughly one-third of the 60 people Patel criticized in his 2023 book Government Gangsters have since faced FBI scrutiny. That includes former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan, both central figures in the Russia investigation into Trump.
“That is an entirely inaccurate presupposition,” Patel said. “I do not have an enemies list.”

As Patel sparred with Democrats, he leaned heavily on statistics to defend his leadership, citing the arrests of 23,000 violent felons this year, the seizure of 6,000 weapons, and the capture of 1,500 child predators.
But for lawmakers like Booker, the numbers failed to address what they see as a deeper crisis: the FBI’s independence. “You’ve gutted the bureau of institutional knowledge and expertise,” Booker warned. “Your failure does have serious implications for the safety and security of Americans.”
Whether Patel can survive such intense scrutiny may depend less on Democrats’ fury than on Trump’s continued backing. For now, Republicans are standing firmly behind him — even as questions mount about whether the FBI’s most sensitive investigations are being wielded as political weapons.
