Attorney General Pam Bondi is facing fury from the very movement that helped elevate her after vowing to crack down on hate speech in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
“There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society,” Bondi said on The Katie Miller Podcast. “We will absolutely target you, go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”
Bondi’s comments quickly ignited outrage across the MAGA sphere, where conservative activists and influencers accused her of betraying core First Amendment principles.

“Our Attorney General is apparently a moron,” conservative pundit Erick Erickson fumed on X. Others echoed his anger, with Rogan O’Handley (a.k.a. DC Draino) writing, “We don’t need gov’t crackdowns on ‘hate speech.’ Let private citizens on X call out abhorrent speech.”
The account End Wokeness, with nearly four million followers, went further, calling Bondi’s stance “yikes” and insisting, “What we need is a massive crackdown on trans terror cells, not some ‘hate speech’ police.”
The backlash is rooted in Kirk’s own absolutist defense of free speech. The 31-year-old Turning Point USA founder, assassinated Sept. 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University, had insisted just last year: “Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There’s ugly speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And ALL of it is protected.”
Bondi’s remarks appear to defy that legacy. A video circulating online juxtaposed her interview with Kirk’s own words, underscoring the tension between her Justice Department vow and Kirk’s free-speech doctrine.
Even Bondi’s attempt at clarification—posting on X that “hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment”—did little to quell the outrage. “You cannot call for someone’s murder,” she wrote. “You cannot swat a Member of Congress. You cannot dox a conservative family and think it will be brushed off as ‘free speech.’”
Civil liberties advocates warn the government’s sudden emphasis on prosecuting “hate speech” risks becoming a tool of selective enforcement, especially as probes have already been launched into university staff and public employees who made incendiary remarks about Kirk.
Bondi, a longtime Trump loyalist and former Florida attorney general confirmed as U.S. Attorney General earlier this year, now finds herself in the unusual position of being attacked not by Democrats but by the MAGA base.
As conservative commentator Matt Walsh bluntly put it: “There is no law against saying hateful things, and there shouldn’t be.”
The internal rift highlights how Kirk’s assassination has fractured the movement he helped build — with one of its top law-and-order voices now accused of betraying the very ideals he claimed to defend.
