Convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has been quietly moved to one of America’s most lenient federal prisons — a minimum-security facility known as “Club Fed” — as she seeks a deal to reveal what she knows about Jeffrey Epstein and his high-powered network of enablers.

Maxwell, 63, is now housed at Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, home to other infamous white-collar inmates including Elizabeth Holmes and Real Housewives star Jen Shah. It’s a stark contrast from the tighter security of her previous Florida prison. At Bryan, inmates enjoy relatively free movement, no perimeter fencing, and access to open grounds.

While the Federal Bureau of Prisons confirmed the transfer, it offered no explanation for the sudden downgrade. But insiders believe the move is linked to recent high-level discussions Maxwell had with the Justice Department — specifically Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a close Trump ally and the former president’s own defense lawyer.

Maxwell’s attorney, David Oscar Marcus, confirmed the transfer but declined to comment further. However, a source close to the negotiations told The Post that Maxwell is “serious about cooperating” and wants immunity in exchange for testimony regarding Epstein’s global trafficking network and the prominent individuals allegedly involved.

From Predator to Witness?

Maxwell was convicted in 2021 for helping Epstein groom and traffic underage girls between 1994 and 2004. She was sentenced to 20 years behind bars and, until recently, had been serving her time at Federal Correctional Institution Tallahassee.

Her sudden shift to a minimum-security camp — typically reserved for inmates with only a few years left — is highly unusual for someone with more than a decade remaining on their sentence.

“It’s one of the best prisons for anyone to go to,” said Josh Lepird of the federal prison officers’ union. “You don’t get moved there unless someone pulls strings — or you’re cooperating.”

Indeed, her transfer wasn’t handled by U.S. Marshals, but directly by BOP officials — further raising eyebrows. She reportedly stopped briefly at FCI Oakdale in Louisiana before arriving in Bryan.

Meetings With the DOJ

Maxwell has met with Blanche at least twice in the past two weeks, reportedly offering to divulge details about Epstein’s contacts, documents seized from his mansions, and the inner workings of the trafficking ring that operated for decades.

According to her attorney, Maxwell “honestly answered” Blanche’s questions. But the DOJ has long expressed skepticism about her credibility, citing her “significant pattern of dishonest conduct.”

Still, the Trump administration’s response to the Epstein investigation has come under fresh scrutiny.

Earlier this year, U.S. Attorney Pam Bondi promised to release a trove of Epstein documents — only to abruptly walk back that pledge, citing “national security” concerns. Meanwhile, congressional calls for full transparency continue to grow louder, particularly from Democrats who accuse Trump of stalling the investigation.

Justice Department officials have also acknowledged that they possess over 300 gigabytes of Epstein-related digital evidence — including emails, video footage, and financial records. But only a fraction of that material has been released publicly.

Will Maxwell Talk — and Walk?

Maxwell’s team has reportedly floated offers to testify before Congress — but only if she’s granted immunity. And sources say the possibility of a commuted sentence or even a presidential pardon has been discussed quietly in Trump’s inner circle.

When asked earlier this week about the possibility of pardoning Maxwell, Trump didn’t rule it out. “Nobody’s approached me about it,” he said. “But we’ll see.”

That’s a chilling possibility for many victims and advocacy groups, who argue that Maxwell should serve every day of her sentence.

“She was Epstein’s enabler and handler,” said Virginia Giuffre’s family in a recent statement. “We don’t want her talking for immunity. We want her to rot in prison.”

What’s Next?

Two New York federal judges are currently considering whether to release sealed grand jury testimony related to both Maxwell and Epstein. But even if approved, those disclosures would include only a narrow set of law enforcement witnesses — not the full trove of evidence the DOJ is holding.

And with Maxwell now housed in comfort, under protection, and possibly negotiating from a position of leverage, the question isn’t whether she’ll name names.

It’s whether the government — and the Trump administration — will let the public hear them.