In a legal strike that has stunned both political and media circles, French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, have filed a defamation lawsuit in the United States against conservative commentator and influencer Candace Owens. The lawsuit, lodged in Delaware on Wednesday, seeks a jury trial and punitive damages for what the Macrons call “relentless, defamatory fictions” that have gone viral across social media.
At the center of the 218-page lawsuit is Owens’ widely viewed online series, Becoming Brigitte, which claims—without evidence—that France’s First Lady was born male under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux. The series, published on YouTube and social media platforms, has amassed over 2.3 million views and sparked international speculation and online abuse.
But the Macrons say enough is enough.
“The principle here is truth,” said their attorney, Thomas Clare of the defamation-specialist firm Clare Locke. “They believe it’s important to stand up for themselves… Owens has had multiple opportunities to do the right thing. In response, she mocked them.”
The lawsuit marks a rare moment in modern international law: a sitting head of state personally suing an American media figure. But the Macrons’ legal team made clear they’re willing to travel to Delaware and testify in person if that’s what it takes.
According to the filing, Owens not only claimed Brigitte Macron is transgender, but also alleged the couple are blood relatives and that President Macron is the result of a CIA mind-control experiment—specifically tying him to MKUltra, the infamous Cold War-era project known for torture and psychological manipulation.
“These are not just bizarre conspiracy theories,” the complaint argues. “They are attacks designed to humiliate, to discredit, and to destroy reputations for personal gain.”
Owens’ camp has so far refused to apologize or retract the statements. A spokesperson said she would respond on her podcast.
The timing of the suit is politically significant. Just weeks ago, Donald Trump filed his own lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, accusing it of libel over its reporting on his alleged correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. Some observers see a global trend emerging: public figures fighting back against the weaponization of online platforms.
But under U.S. defamation law, the Macrons will face a high bar. As public figures, they must prove “actual malice”—that Owens knew her statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
The filing argues Owens continued to repeat and monetize the falsehoods even after being contacted by the Macrons’ attorneys. It cites repeated “mocking” responses and zero corrective action. The Macrons allege reputational harm and financial costs spent to “correct the public record.”
What began as a fringe theory in France in 2021 has since been amplified by American voices like Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan. The Macrons initially avoided responding, hoping to avoid feeding the fire. But after Owens launched an eight-part YouTube series and refused all private attempts at resolution, they decided to go public—and legal.
The complaint also dives into the history between the President and First Lady. Emmanuel Macron was 15 when he met Brigitte, then a 39-year-old married teacher directing a school play. The filing asserts their relationship was entirely legal, and references a letter sent to Owens last December refuting any notion of statutory rape.
In perhaps the most surreal twist, Owens claimed in her series that Macron’s identity as a “CIA experiment” explains his intellect and charisma. The Macrons’ lawsuit states bluntly: “President Macron has not participated in, nor is he the product of, any government mind control programmes.”
It’s not the first time Brigitte Macron has taken legal action. In 2022, she won a defamation suit in France against a clairvoyant blogger who promoted similar theories—though the decision was later overturned on appeal.
Now, the First Couple of France is escalating the fight to a U.S. court, aiming not only to clear their names but to set a precedent for digital accountability in an age where truth is under siege.
Owens, once a loyal Trump ally, has since distanced herself from the former president, calling her past support “embarrassing.” She married George Farmer, former CEO of Parler, at a Trump winery in 2019.
As the lawsuit unfolds, it raises a broader question: Can powerful political figures protect themselves from the viral onslaught of misinformation? Or has the post-truth era become too fast, too global, and too reckless for courts to contain?
The Macrons are betting the truth still matters—and they’re willing to cross an ocean to prove it.
